Alexander Lucard ([info]alexlucard) wrote,
@ 2005-05-11 09:48:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Edit Entry  Edit Tags  Next Entry
Vampire Hunter Drama Part 3
http://www.livejournal.com/users/alexlucard/840004.html#cutid1 is part two, and there's a link in there to part one.

Anyway, the arch rival of Sean Manchester, the guy who has been annoying me since I was a teenager and the subject of the last two posts on the subject has emailed me as of last night. This guy has a criminal record a mile long, from digging up corpses and violating them on down.

But at least he's more eloquent in his madness than Machester. here's David Farrant's email to me.




Dear Alex Lucard
I was most intrigued by all your comments here about the so-called Highgate Vampire; not least about myself being a 'vampire hunter'! It would appear that you arrive at most of your conclusions about the Highgate Case and myself from sensational accounts you have gleaned from the internet the problem is however that almost invariably, most of this inaccurate sensationalism as been posted up by Mr Sean Manchester himself (Please note he is NOT a genuing bishop) and if you check back on these accounts you will see that I have only been forced to correct unfounded public allegations made by Mr Manchester himself - albeit frequently hiding behind his usual aliases.

It is not my intention to argue against all the points you have recently made on the insidepulse website, as I appreciate you, like anybody else are entitled to personal opinions (however wrong or misguided these have proved to be in your particular case).

I will just say one thing however, to set the record straight for you - ... I am NOT a 'vampire hunter', in reality I am just a psychic investigator and I do not even accept the existence of 'blood sucking vampires'. Mr Manchester apparently does (as he has publically stated in his self-published book The Highgate Vampire), but that is really his problem! In passing, I can conclude by saying that my non-acceptance of Mr Manchester's ridiculous public claims he makes about 'vampires', has been the main reason for his campaign of hatred against members of The British Psychic and Occult Society and myself.

Yours Sincerely
David Farrant
President BPOS.

NB: In the event that you might be interested my main website can be found at http://www.dfarrant.co.uk also could I refer you to Occult Forums International Vampire Thread, Off Topic Occult. The link is http://www.occultforums.com from which Mr Manchester has just been publically banned (within the last 3 or 4 days or so.


SHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUP! Sigh. My email to him

Ummm...Dave? That column you read of mine was me printing the whack job hilarious emails Manchester sent me. Re-read the column. Those are his words, not mine with me making fun of him at the end.

It was in reference to the column I wrote back in Jan '05 (http://www.insidepulse.com/article.php?contentid=31102) where I recanted the entire Highgate vampire saga.

I know Manchester very well. And by that I mean, I know him by reputation very well, as he's been the butt of American folklorists and parapsychologists for as long as I can remember. Norrine Dresser, Paul barber, Carol Page. All of us snicker quite profusely at the whole "Highgate Vampire" incident.

I'll tell you what I told Manchester: Stop acting like children. Both of you. This happened 30 years ago. My god, both of you are old enough to be at retirement age soon and you're carrying on like schoolchildren about an event maybe 5% of the world remembers and only a fraction thereof even cares that it occured.

All your sniping between the two of you does makes you both look foolish and foppish. Like attention whores deserpately clinging to some sort of public limelight when one of you just needs to start completely ignoring the other. I don't care if he starts it, or is just really good at getting your goat, because the end result is STILL the two of you bickering of the world wide web. Please stop.

-Lucard


Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]ganbaru
2005-05-11 03:05 pm UTC (from 134.29.155.106) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
No way, keep it coming!
What I learned from this:
  • I need unkempt hair to be a vampire hunter.
  • I need a big gold medalion of something cool to look official.
  • Once I get everyone referring to me as a vampire hunter, I should deny it completely to regain some sanity points.
  • I need a website.
    I really can't think of anything more I will need, save for some books and a stake or something.
    This stuff just keeps getting better and better. :D
  • (Reply to this)(Thread)

    (no subject) - [info]alexlucard, 2005-05-11 03:08 pm UTC
    (no subject) - [info]ganbaru, 2005-05-11 03:12 pm UTC
    (no subject) - [info]alexlucard, 2005-05-11 03:17 pm UTC
    (no subject) - [info]ganbaru, 2005-05-11 03:23 pm UTC
    (no subject) - [info]alexlucard, 2005-05-11 03:27 pm UTC
    (no subject) - [info]ganbaru, 2005-05-11 04:34 pm UTC
    (no subject) - [info]alexlucard, 2005-05-11 04:38 pm UTC
    (no subject) - [info]ganbaru, 2005-05-11 04:46 pm UTC
    (no subject) - [info]alexlucard, 2005-05-11 04:47 pm UTC
    (no subject) - [info]ganbaru, 2005-05-11 04:49 pm UTC
    (no subject) - [info]alexlucard, 2005-05-11 04:53 pm UTC
    (no subject) - [info]ganbaru, 2005-05-11 04:59 pm UTC
    (no subject) - [info]alexlucard, 2005-05-11 05:03 pm UTC
    (no subject) - [info]ganbaru, 2005-05-11 05:08 pm UTC
    (no subject) - [info]alexlucard, 2005-05-11 05:09 pm UTC
    (no subject) - [info]ganbaru, 2005-05-11 07:40 pm UTC

    [info]abject_endism
    2005-05-11 03:52 pm UTC (from 159.37.7.44) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    Anytime you have a paranormal investigator who latches on to a story and then in the course of investigating it claims to have encountered the phenomenon themselves, I call into question their objectivity. Keel was guilty of that too.

    (Reply to this)(Thread)

    (no subject) - [info]alexlucard, 2005-05-11 03:52 pm UTC
    (no subject) - [info]abject_endism, 2005-05-11 03:54 pm UTC
    (no subject) - [info]alexlucard, 2005-05-11 03:56 pm UTC
    (no subject) - [info]abject_endism, 2005-05-11 04:48 pm UTC
    (no subject) - [info]alexlucard, 2005-05-11 04:51 pm UTC

    [info]supergiantninja
    2005-05-11 05:27 pm UTC (from 65.28.24.47) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    It's people like this that make me an atheist...

    (Reply to this)(Thread)

    (no subject) - [info]alexlucard, 2005-05-11 05:45 pm UTC
    (no subject) - [info]ganbaru, 2005-05-11 07:41 pm UTC

    [info]vvvvv
    2005-05-11 08:34 pm UTC (from 65.248.216.185) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    That second paragraph SLAYED me. YOUR OPINION IS WRONG! But you're entitled to it?

    You can tell these guys they can strt emailing me instead, my job's been boring lately.

    (Also: be careful with recant/recount. The grammar nazi thing is like a tic, I can't help it.)

    (Reply to this)(Thread)

    (no subject) - [info]alexlucard, 2005-05-11 08:36 pm UTC
    (no subject) - [info]buddhamike, 2005-05-12 01:43 am UTC

    [info]pantherwill
    2005-05-12 02:36 am UTC (from 24.119.60.178) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    This is the sort of thing that makes me believe in a god, if only because the prospect of these dipshits being at the top of the food chain is too depressing to contemplate.

    (Reply to this)(Thread)

    (no subject) - [info]alexlucard, 2005-05-12 12:51 pm UTC
    (no subject) - [info]one_true_snarf, 2005-05-12 02:10 pm UTC
    The Highgate Vampire
    [info]cathanddavid
    2005-06-09 12:35 am UTC (from 213.78.91.193) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    Are you all being really serious?! I am NOT a vampire hunter, nor have I ever claimed to have been. It was the media and television that ascribed this 'title' to myself, not myself. Mr. Manchester, on the other hand claims to be a real life 'vampire hunter'; that is a title that he attributed to himself quite freely - and still attributes to himself in the present day - so any confusion much surely arrive between Mr. Manchester's descriptions of himself as opposed to my real position as a psychic investigator; one, who in fact, does not even accept the existence of 'blood-sucking vampires'!

    It surely does not need too much intelligence to work out who is really making such outragous claims?! Mr. Manchester seems to have said it all. You here, seem to be taking his outragous claims (about staking vampires etc)at face value. That is not really my fault. I never made such claims in the first place, so that is really Mr. Manchester's problem. And with respect, must be a problem for anyone here who is taking such outragous claims (as Mr Manchester, himself, has made) seriously?!

    Please stop branding me as a 'vampire hunter'. I am NOT, and have never claimed to be so.

    Yours Sincerely
    David Farrant, President of The British Psychic and Occult Society

    (Reply to this)(Thread)

    Re: The Highgate Vampire - [info]alexlucard, 2005-06-09 01:03 am UTC
    Re: The Highgate Vampire - [info]buddhamike, 2005-06-09 01:06 am UTC
    The Highgate Vampire Continued
    [info]cathanddavid
    2005-06-10 12:47 am UTC (from 213.78.74.6) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    FOR ALEX LUCARD ( And whoever else happens to be interested in all this!)

    Some of your past remarks and references to Mr. Manchester have indeed been brought to my attention. But would you please note that I was only responding to (or being forced to respond to) remarks or references that you, yourself, made about the so-called Highgate Vampire Case in the first place.

    You may well have implied that Mr. Manchester was a ‘loony’ (and I wouldn’t disagree with that) but in reality, if you hadn’t published any of Mr. Manchester’s emails regarding us in the first place, we would have had no need to respond. (I say, ‘we’ - and we are all in full agreement - but please remember I am writing this myself personally).

    Thank you for acknowledging that I am not a ‘vampire hunter’; it has taken me literally years to get this through to many people. And I still do not seem to have conveyed this point here. However, I think further comment about this could only result in repetition, may I respectfully suggest that maybe this matter could be closed?

    Yours etc,
    David Farrant, President of the BPOS


    (Reply to this)(Thread)

    "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - (Anonymous), 2006-04-15 05:12 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - [info]buddhamike, 2006-04-17 07:58 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - [info]cerulgalactus, 2006-04-17 11:17 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - (Anonymous), 2006-04-18 08:33 am UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - (Anonymous), 2006-05-08 02:45 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - (Anonymous), 2006-05-09 09:21 am UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - (Anonymous), 2006-05-09 09:23 am UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - (Anonymous), 2006-05-09 09:24 am UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - (Anonymous), 2006-05-09 04:57 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - (Anonymous), 2006-05-09 05:08 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - (Anonymous), 2006-05-09 05:34 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - (Anonymous), 2006-05-09 05:24 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - [info]alexlucard, 2006-05-09 05:29 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - [info]buddhamike, 2006-05-11 04:53 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - [info]alexlucard, 2006-05-11 04:56 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - (Anonymous), 2006-05-12 05:04 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - [info]alexlucard, 2006-05-12 05:20 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - (Anonymous), 2006-05-12 11:18 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - [info]alexlucard, 2006-05-12 11:50 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - (Anonymous), 2006-05-13 12:26 am UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - [info]alexlucard, 2006-05-13 02:40 am UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - (Anonymous), 2006-05-15 10:49 am UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - [info]alexlucard, 2006-05-15 02:27 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - (Anonymous), 2006-05-15 03:12 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - [info]alexlucard, 2006-05-15 03:49 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - (Anonymous), 2006-05-17 01:01 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - [info]alexlucard, 2006-05-22 02:37 am UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - [info]wolfbaronxylo, 2006-05-15 04:19 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - (Anonymous), 2006-05-17 01:02 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - [info]alexlucard, 2006-05-22 02:37 am UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - (Anonymous), 2006-05-20 08:02 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - [info]pantherwill, 2006-06-03 05:38 am UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - [info]alexlucard, 2006-06-03 01:56 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - [info]pantherwill, 2006-06-03 07:39 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - (Anonymous), 2006-05-17 08:21 am UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - [info]alexlucard, 2006-05-22 02:34 am UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - (Anonymous), 2006-05-20 03:59 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - [info]alexlucard, 2006-05-22 02:32 am UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - (Anonymous), 2006-05-22 08:40 am UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - [info]alexlucard, 2006-05-22 08:56 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - (Anonymous), 2006-05-24 05:26 pm UTC
    Re: "I am NOT a vampire hunter" - [info]alexlucard, 2006-05-24 05:33 pm UTC

    [info]wulfsbane
    2006-05-11 03:27 pm UTC (from 69.180.188.156) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    My hypothesis:

    The vampire war has already happend, and we lost. There's now two categories of people: Those who are prey, and those who are vampires. Only the vampires don't KNOW they are vampires. When they "vamp out", they lose control of their conscious mind, and retain no knowledge of their actions.

    (Reply to this)

    The madness of King Sean
    (Anonymous)
    2006-05-13 05:08 am UTC (from 82.38.130.19) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    He also took his cross and stake to Robin Hood's Grave in West Yorkshire looking for a vampire. He wrote about this is his book the Vampire Hunters Handbook if you dont believe me. He also said he had a vision of Princess Diana when she died and claimed the Holy Ghost descended on his head when he became a priest--in a holy shimmering light. For all his claims to be a famous vampire hunter we have been unable to get him to name the hundreds of vampires he has slain in his post of "professional" vampire hunter. These are either delusions or lies. If they a re the truth then, folks--we are in the presence of a saint and should be singing his praises ! Saint or sinner, madman or Munchausons? However, some of us have had some rather unsaintly things said about us, so I know where I am casting my vote!

    (Reply to this)(Thread)

    Re: The madness of Barbara Green - (Anonymous), 2006-05-15 10:55 am UTC
    Re: The madness of Barbara Green - (Anonymous), 2006-05-15 04:36 pm UTC
    Re: Jealousy - (Anonymous), 2006-05-16 09:19 am UTC
    Re: Jealousy - (Anonymous), 2006-05-22 04:28 pm UTC
    I don't agree
    (Anonymous)
    2006-05-13 04:13 pm UTC (from 81.76.121.244) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    Actually I don't agree. Why do you find it necessary to make fun of people? Especially when their personal details are being paraded about on 'your blog'. Just because you are a so-called professional and enjoy having your personal details paraded about the internet does not mean that the rest of us enjoy it. If you were in the UK this blog would have been deleted immediately.

    Actually David Farrant and co are not Nutters. They are quite sane people. How can you say such things about people who you do not know. The reason why I wish to stay anonymous is because I can't be bothered joining up yet another inane blog.

    You are not acting your age. You are behaving just as childish as the other 'anonymous' on this blog.

    Ha, call yourself a researcher, I don't think so.

    (Reply to this)(Thread)

    Re: I don't agree - [info]alexlucard, 2006-05-13 04:25 pm UTC
    Re: I don't agree - (Anonymous), 2006-05-13 06:00 pm UTC
    Re: I don't agree - [info]alexlucard, 2006-05-13 06:04 pm UTC
    Re: Amateurs and Professionals - (Anonymous), 2006-05-15 06:17 am UTC
    Re: Amateurs and Professionals - (Anonymous), 2006-05-16 08:57 am UTC
    Re: Amateurs and Professionals - (Anonymous), 2006-05-23 07:59 am UTC
    Amateurs and Professionals - (Anonymous), 2006-05-15 03:07 pm UTC
    Re: Amateurs and Professionals - (Anonymous), 2006-05-16 08:55 am UTC
    fame at last!
    (Anonymous)
    2006-05-22 06:11 pm UTC (from 82.38.130.19) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    Thanks Georgie Pin---its a frighful bore, but I have seen it all before, boo hoo!

    The tea pot cosy is always on the prowl striking wherever he can!

    Fancy a grown man behaving like that! What a twerp!

    (Reply to this)(Thread)

    Re: fame at last! - (Anonymous), 2006-06-01 06:50 pm UTC
    Manchester?
    (Anonymous)
    2006-05-26 10:16 pm UTC (from 67.68.240.44) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    This so-claim bishop is not what he seems to be. (P.S.: Hir followers are retards).

    (Reply to this)(Thread)

    Re: Manchester? - (Anonymous), 2006-05-29 03:41 pm UTC
    Manchester The Nazi - (Anonymous), 2006-06-01 12:27 pm UTC
    Re: Manchester The Nazi - [info]alexlucard, 2006-06-01 01:09 pm UTC
    Re: Manchester The Satanist - (Anonymous), 2006-06-01 01:25 pm UTC
    Re: Manchester The Nazi - (Anonymous), 2006-06-01 01:29 pm UTC
    Re: Manchester The Nazi - (Anonymous), 2006-06-01 03:18 pm UTC
    Re: Manchester The Nazi - (Anonymous), 2006-06-01 03:34 pm UTC
    Şëąñ Manchester - The Truth
    (Anonymous)
    2006-06-01 01:52 pm UTC (from 82.18.10.226) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    Aaaahh so THIS is how you start a new thread!!!

    Well now children, I hope you're sitting in a comfy chair as I have a tale to tell.

    Actually, sod the talking, I have some pictures for you to check out.

    I dedicate this thread to the fat sweaty, blubbering man mound of Moronic bollocks that is...
    Şëąñ Manchester.

    Şëąñ is a cock.
    The guy claims to have killed 2 vampires...uh huh...yeah...course you did mate.
    With your wooden stake and mallet...phnaaar phnaaarr

    Funny how he calls himself a Bishop yet hasn't studied a single days worth of a theology degree.

    Funny how he also dressed as a Nazi and a Satanist, 4 & 7 years respectively after being 'ordained' Superior Sancti Graal by his bent mate from London.

    Bishop?
    So care to explain the following pictures?
    The top one comes from a British Newspaper and has already passed the legal channels of the AP so it is well within the public domain and there's fuck all the retard can do about it.


    Image
    Image

    Yes ladies and gentleman, it is the same sweating blubbering mound of shite.

    Please remember, that these pictures were taken 4 years and 7 years after his appointment as Superior Sancti Graal.

    That means while ordained into his own little church, he was dressing up as a Nazi and spreading fear amongst a largely Jewish neighbourhood.
    He was helped out by a friend of his called John Pope...who just so happened to be a self confessed Satanist.

    Now if Şëąñ tries to get out of that, maybe he can explain why he is dressed as a Satanist and holding a satanistic mass in the second picture with some noncey looking bloke?


    First picture = 1977

    Second picture =1980

    His appointment as Superior General = 1973

    The fact thathe is now sweating like Michael Jackson at a school disco = Priceless


    Now watch his desperately try and get the pictures removed only to have me put them back up straight away.
    I urge you all to save them to your hard drive and post them at your will.

    The only other thing he can do, is bore the shit out of you with cut and pastes and random quotes from slack jawed halfwits who believe in Vampires.

    Well Sean, have some of this as a quote you vile little anti-semetic bastard and for fucks sake, stop trying to chum up Alucard with your Bishoply love.


    Lots of Love
    Archbishop Shórñ Scrotūm



    ~ Cletus Buttphuck, HMP Broadmoor, Spasticsville

    “That Sean sure knows how to suck cock. He was my number 1 prison bitch and took it up the gary without any lubricant.
    He's nuttier than a bag of almonds and should be back in Broadmoor...Sean, write to me darling”



    ~ The Count, Sesame Street

    “He says he kill One Vampire AAHH AAHH AAHHHHHH.....peckerhead”

    (Reply to this)(Thread)

    Re: Şëąñ Manchester - The Truth - (Anonymous), 2006-06-01 04:27 pm UTC
    Re: Barbara Green - The Truth - (Anonymous), 2006-06-02 12:26 pm UTC
    Re: Barbara Green - The Truth - (Anonymous), 2006-06-02 01:23 pm UTC
    Re: Barbara Green - The Truth - (Anonymous), 2006-06-05 01:36 pm UTC
    Re: Barbara Green - The Truth - (Anonymous), 2006-06-05 02:01 pm UTC
    Origins of Nazi Smear and Farrant's Weird Wicca Workers Party
    (Anonymous)
    2006-06-01 05:46 pm UTC (from 195.92.67.76) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    It is amusing to see accusations of "Nazism" levelled by Farrant and his cronies against Bishop Manchester.

    Where is the evidence?

    All we have is Farrant’s word and a thirty-year-old Sunday People article in which Farrant colluded with a journalist to besmirch the bishop. This article, however, did not accuse Bishop Manchester of Nazism. Quite the opposite, in fact, if it is read properly.

    What Farrant had in common with the journalist responsible for the article is a penchant for alcohol. Indeed it was alcoholism which lost Thorne (the Sunday People reporter) his marriage and his job with Mirror Newspapers. He was obliged to go freelance thereafter and live abroad, mostly in unemployed capacity.

    It was not Bishop Manchester who threatened to stand as a WWP candidate at the 1978 General Election on a platform that might well have been that belonging to the National Socialist Party. It was Farrant.

    It was not Bishop Manchester who claimed in the press that he had amalgamated with other political parties, eg the National Front. It was Farrant.

    It was not Bishop Manchester who used Neo-Nazi runes as logos on his circulars. It was Farrant.

    It was not Bishop Manchester who cultivated Neo-Nazi acquaintances as friends and supporters. It was Farrant.

    Bishop Manchester, whilst Farrant was promoting the WWP, held membership in the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament for which he later became North London Regional Co-ordinator under the then chairman Bruce Kent. The bishop was also a member of Pax Christi for which he is now representative in the UK for traditional Old Catholics.

    Ironically, whilst North London Regional Co-ordinator for CND, the bishop and those assisting him at a CND backed "Christmas Fast for Peace" were physically attacked by members of the National Front. The fast itself, which was organised by Bishop Manchester and lasted an entire week, was supported in person by Lord Fenner Brockway who admired the bishop and all he was doing for the peace movement.

    Bishop Manchester has appeared on television and radio programmes over the years to oppose the arms trade and war. He actively opposed the Vietnam War. He actively opposed the Falkland's War. He actively opposed both Gulf Wars. In fact, Bishop Manchester opposes all war and has been an anti-war campaigner his entire life.

    One of the bishop’s closest friends and fellow priests is someone of African origin. See link below. Not the obvious choice for a man whom Farrant and his cronies would have you believe is a "Nazi."

    Link; www.holygrail-church.fsnet.co.uk/Friends.htm

    (Reply to this)(Thread)

    Re: Origins of Nazi Smear and Farrant's Weird Wicca Workers Party - (Anonymous), 2006-06-01 06:14 pm UTC
    Re: Origins of Nazi Smear and Farrant's Weird Wicca Workers Party - (Anonymous), 2006-06-02 12:29 pm UTC
    Re: Origins of Nazi Smear and Farrant's Weird Wicca Workers Party - [info]pinkish, 2006-06-03 03:09 am UTC
    Sunday People Nazi Spoiler - The Facts
    (Anonymous)
    2006-06-01 05:53 pm UTC (from 195.92.67.76) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    Frank Thorne’s sensationalist piece in the Sunday People, 9 October 1977 was based almost entirely on that newspaper reporter’s collaboration with David Farrant who, of course, is violently antipathetic to the person under attack in the article and who had recently been released from prison.

    The Sunday People article came about when Bishop Manchester refused to collude with Frank Thorne on an investigative piece the bishop had begun to have published elsewhere. Thorne published a “spoiler” against the Borehamwood Post exclusive series already in progress under the bishop’s byline. In this “spoiler” ~ titled “We Unmask Phoney Nazis” ~ Thorne attributed quotes to three people, all of whom later denied making them and all of whom issued complaints to the newspaper.

    Complaints against Frank Thorne and the Sunday People were filed with Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd by Bishop Manchester, Mike Clarke and John Russell Pope. A complaint was also lodged with the Press Council by Bishop Manchester against Frank Thorne and the Sunday People. These documents remain on record in the public annals.

    A statement signed by John Russell Pope to complain about the Frank Thorne:

    “On the evening of 6 October 1977, two men called at my home at [address deleted], Barnet, Hertfordshire, and without identifying themselves demanded to see me. My father thought they were police detectives by their manner. When invited to come inside, they refused and insisted that I accompany them to a nearby car. That is when they first revealed themselves to be working for the Sunday People. One, calling himself Frank Thorne, tried to make me say that a photograph of a man in a Nazi uniform was Seán Manchester. They showed me a copy of the Borehamwood Post and tried to make me say that the article called ‘The New Nazis’ was false. But they would not let me read any of the article and did not refer specifically to the ‘League of Imperial Fascists.’ They told me that I would be guaranteed future mention in their newspaper if I co-operated, but I was not prepared to let them use me in this way. The following evening I telephoned the Sunday People and asked to speak to the News Editor. I complained to him about his reporters’ methods, especially Frank Thorne, and reminded him that I belonged to a survivalist group that had political connections, further about which I did not wish to elaborate. I did not seem to get any satisfactory replies, so I spoke to him again on the telephone on Saturday morning, 8 October 1977, by which time I had been told by Seán Manchester what Frank Thorne had alleged I said on Thursday evening, which I knew to be false. I did not identify any person in the photographs shown to me.”

    A statement (ref; CFW/SP/P6282/6/3/78) issued by Mike Clarke, editor of the Borehamwood Post, was noted by the Press Council. This greatly respected newspaper editor denied all the remarks attributed to him by Frank Thorne in the Sunday People article of 9 October 1977. He underlined the fact that he had most definitely not said the words, nor anything similar, to the effect; “I’m afraid I’m left with egg on my face. … I shall be taking legal advice.”

    The complaint lodged by Bishop Seán Manchester with the Press Council was as follows;

    “The Sunday People newspaper concocted an inaccurate article about me which they did not correct when presented with Mr John Pope’s statement and other evidence which showed none of Frank Thorne’s allegations against me to be true. Photographs belonging to me were used in an article without my permission. I was, however, promptly paid £100 for their use, which, unwisely, I accepted as compensation for what amounted to copyright theft. From the start I had made clear to Frank Thorne that I had no wish to ‘collaborate’ on the Nazi story as (a) it was my work, and (b) the Sunday People’s ‘treatment’ of my work, as proposed by Frank Thorne to me, was one I found to be unacceptable. Frank Thorne then threatened to use my material with or without my permission. None of the quotes attributed to me are true. I did not state to Frank Thorne that the ‘Nazi recruiting picture of John Pope’ was ‘faked.’ I did identify the person in the picture [of the ‘Commander’]. This was ignored by Frank Thorne.”

    (Reply to this)

    Sunday People Nazi Spoiler - The Facts
    (Anonymous)
    2006-06-01 05:54 pm UTC (from 195.92.67.76) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    A statement (ref; CFW/SP/P6282/6/3/78) issued by Mike Clarke, editor of the Borehamwood Post, was noted by the Press Council. This greatly respected newspaper editor denied all the remarks attributed to him by Frank Thorne in the Sunday People article of 9 October 1977. He underlined the fact that he had most definitely not said the words, nor anything similar, to the effect; “I’m afraid I’m left with egg on my face. … I shall be taking legal advice.”

    The complaint lodged by Bishop Seán Manchester with the Press Council was as follows;

    “The Sunday People newspaper concocted an inaccurate article about me which they did not correct when presented with Mr John Pope’s statement and other evidence which showed none of Frank Thorne’s allegations against me to be true. Photographs belonging to me were used in an article without my permission. I was, however, promptly paid £100 for their use, which, unwisely, I accepted as compensation for what amounted to copyright theft. From the start I had made clear to Frank Thorne that I had no wish to ‘collaborate’ on the Nazi story as (a) it was my work, and (b) the Sunday People’s ‘treatment’ of my work, as proposed by Frank Thorne to me, was one I found to be unacceptable. Frank Thorne then threatened to use my material with or without my permission. None of the quotes attributed to me are true. I did not state to Frank Thorne that the ‘Nazi recruiting picture of John Pope’ was ‘faked.’ I did identify the person in the picture [of the ‘Commander’]. This was ignored by Frank Thorne.”

    A compelling piece of evidence presented to the Press Council was Thorne’s reliance on collusion with David Farrant.

    Nobody else was willing to “identify” the Nazi Commander in the stolen photograph. For legal reasons Thorne fraudulently added Pope’s name to the identification, but Pope denied making any such identification as his signed statement of 9 December 1977 attests. Furthermore, Pope, off the record, claimed that he had been “roughed up” by Thorne and the accompanying journalist when they took him away from his home for interrogation in their car.

    (Reply to this)

    Sunday People Nazi Spoiler - The Facts
    (Anonymous)
    2006-06-01 05:55 pm UTC (from 195.92.67.76) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    Incredibly, David Farrant, who is extremely antipathetic toward Bishop Manchester, agreed to make a statement (probably seeing its publicity potential) which he duly signed on 2 January 1978. The statement was lodged with the Press Council by Bishop Manchester. Farrant’s statement follows;

    “On Thursday, 6 October 1977, I received a ‘phone call from Trevor Aspenal of the Sunday People who enquired about my relationship with Seán Manchester and the British Occult Society. I told him there was no change and that we were still strongly opposed to each other. I then spoke to Frank Thorne of the same newspaper who asked me if I could identify Seán Manchester in a picture. I told him that I would be able to. He then arranged for me to attend the Sunday People’s offices where I was shown a photograph of someone in a Nazi uniform. He then showed me a number of other photographs of men and women in Nazi uniforms. I identified one of the men as John Pope. I agreed with Frank Thorne that the original picture shown to me could have been Seán Manchester.”

    Unfortunately, the payment as compensation by the Sunday People to Bishop Manchester for pictures used by them without his permission technically placed the complainant in a contractual relationship with the newspaper, thus contravening paragraph 4 of the Press Council’s guidelines. The Press Council, therefore, were unable to process the complaint, but nonetheless acknowledged in writing that Bishop Manchester, Mike Clarke and John Russell Pope had disavowed the quotes attributed to them by Frank Thorne in the Sunday People article of 9 October 1977.

    Six months after publication of the offending article in 1977, Thorne accompanied David Farrant on a train journey to Grimsby where Farrant was photographed with “fiancée” Nancy O’Hoski outside a church for a half-page feature about their proposed wedding. Published in the Sunday People, 16 April 1978, Thorne’s article opens with the following words;

    “Self-styled witch king David Farrant ~ the man jailed for desecrating a tomb and threatening detectives with voodoo ~ has a new shock in store. What’s more, Britain’s best-known Prince of Darkness is dreaming of a traditional white wedding.”

    The article quoted Farrant as saying; “I want to put my ghoulish past behind me now. … Either I give up witchcraft or Nancy.”

    Soon after the story was printed, Farrant gave up Nancy O’Hoski, a speech therapist (Farrant suffers from a nervous stammer). They did not get married. Then came a very curious turn of events. Farrant, within days of the publicity generated by his abandoned wedding plans in the Sunday People, prepared to stand as a candidate in the forthcoming British General Election. He launched what was described as the “Wicca Workers Party” to the cry of “Wiccans Awake!”

    (Reply to this)

    Farrant's Weird Wicca Workers Party and Nazi Connections
    (Anonymous)
    2006-06-01 05:59 pm UTC (from 195.92.67.76) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    David Farrant prepared to stand as a candidate in the forthcoming British General Election soon after the Sunday People "spoiler." He launched what was described as the “Wicca Workers Party” to the cry of “Wiccans Awake!”

    Journalist Peter Hounam wrote a front page story for the Hornsey Journal, 30 June 1978, that thundered;

    “A new peril for candidates fighting the marginal Hornsey constituency emerged this week with news that some of their supporters who indulge in witchcraft may switch their votes to the ‘Wicca Workers Party’ in the General Election. … Mr Farrant, who lives in Muswell Hill Road, is fighting under the slogan ‘Wiccans Awake’.”

    Farrant became more confident and published a letter in the Hornsey Journal, 21 July 1978, which stated;

    “It is not my intention to use your letter columns to promulgate the views of the Wicca Workers Party or to become involved in futile argument with any of your readers, but having seen the opinions expressed in the letter columns of the Journal, I feel that I should set the record straight. In fact, the WWP is a serious political party and has growing support from people all over the country; including other political groups with whom we are now amalgamated.”

    Having only ever met Bishop Manchester on one occasion, briefly on 5 October 1977, Frank Thorne was to provide further misrepresentation for a scandalous French magazine called Entervue in 1994. From the safety of another country, he described the bishop, who he had not spoken to for seventeen years, as “mentally very disturbed.” Thorne, on the other hand, had himself described as “a famous journalist.”

    Nowadays Thorne is unemployed and resides in Sydney, Australia.

    Interviewed by Entervue, a notorious French publication that even major celebrities did not stoop to sue for defamation, Thorne falsely claimed that the bishop was “an adept of a satanic cult [who] even gave courses in magic … a Nazi … a sorcerer … and director of a funeral company.” This absurd and libellous nonsense is, of course, without any foundation. Entervue did not seek any balancing comment from Bishop Manchester who remained oblivious to their article’s existence until the close of the century when it was reproduced in a self-published pamphlet by Farrant, by which time Entervue had folded.

    John Pope continued with his Neo-Nazi involvements and more recently published a piece in the journal of the south-western branch of the National Front.

    David Farrant has a history of association with people who hold Neo-Nazi views. He connects, for example, to names such as Philippe Welte and Jean-Paul Bourre, two Frenchman who greatly admired Adolf Hitler when Farrant was in collaboration with them in the 1980s. There are others. Farrant's friend and associate for many years, Kenneth Frewen, was a National Front supporter.

    (Reply to this)(Thread)

    Re: Farrant's Weird Wicca Workers Party and Nazi Connections - (Anonymous), 2006-06-01 06:16 pm UTC
    Farrant and the Gomeche/Combat 18 Connection
    (Anonymous)
    2006-06-01 06:02 pm UTC (from 195.92.67.76) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    Most recently Ian Keith Gomeche (aka IKG) posted on Scott Johnson’s AMCGLTD blogsite under his net name "Noncewatch" (at a time when he was still moderating a section of Column 18’s Neo-Nazi message board). Gomeche came onto Johnson’s blog-site specifically at the behest of Farrant and company to harass, threaten and defame Bishop Manchester.

    On 18 July 2004 at 09;46pm Johnson allowed the then administrator of Combat 18’s hate-filled "Noncewatch" section to start posting abuse about Bishop Manchester. Gomeche collaborated with David Farrant and Farrant’s girlfriend, Catherine Fearnley. Together these three colluded to publish on Combat 18’s message board the identity and private address of Bishop Manchester, along with a photograph of the bishop (stolen from the internet), with incitements of hatred that would appeal to visitors of a Neo-Nazi website. This would coincide with the spate of messages from Gomeche (posting under his then familiar nickname of "Noncewatch") on Scott Johnson’s AMCGLTD.

    When advised of the factually incorrect content and other violations in the messages Scott Johnson was allowing to be posted on his site, Johnson refused to remove them, explaining that he would like the bishop’s rebuttals instead. Johnson seemed at first interested in fuelling the situation to boost visits to his site and the fact that he was uniquely providing a platform for a hate campaign against someone living thousands of miles away that nobody else was willing to offer did not appear to bother him. Those who did attempt to respond in Bishop Manchester’s favour, however, were immediately deleted and blocked. It became apparent that this was to be a one-sided affair.

    Johnson eventually made clear that neither Bishop Manchester nor anyone sympathetic toward the bishop would be allowed a voice.

    The psychotic behaviour of Ian Keith Gomeche toward Bishop Manchester was triggered entirely by Farrant and others of his coterie who posted on AMCGLTD in 2004, conspiring with Gomeche to disseminate calumny and to incite hatred against the bishop on the internet for the next thirteen months.

    Gomeche needed no encouragement where harassment and hatred are involved, as countless other victims already know to their cost. His attacks on innocent people via the internet has lasted a number of years.

    Under section of the Mental Health Act, Gomeche was moved last year from prison to the Cornhill Psychiatric Hospital in Aberdeen with a preliminary diagnosis of "psychosis," and there are reports that further tests now appear to diagnose "bi-polar affective disorder with schizophrenia."

    While this does unfortunately mean that there may be no final legal closure for those who have suffered Gomeche’s criminal victimisation and harassment over many years, it does ensure that he will remain isolated and unable to harrass while he undergoes treatment, something we must accept as a valid alternative. Additionally, it has been explicitly confirmed by the investigating officers that should he be released in the future and re-offend, immediate action will be taken to bring him into custody without delay on first report received by the local police. This does guarantee some confidence at last among those who have suffered that they can finally go about their lawful business without having to fear his unrestricted reappearance in future.

    Gomeche’s seized computers revealed e-mail exchanges between Gomeche and David Farrant, Gomeche and Catherine Fearnley, and Gomeche and Barbara Green (and vice versa, of course) where evidence of these persons conspiracy to harass Bishop Manchester on the internet was established. This much will be confirmed by Grampian Police.

    Link: www.iangomeche.com

    (Reply to this)

    SEAN IS SHITTING HIMSELF
    (Anonymous)
    2006-06-01 06:11 pm UTC (from 82.18.10.226) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    NOTICE HOW SEAN REFUSES TO EXPLAIN WHY HE WAS DRESSED AS A NAZI AND A SATANIST?

    NOTICE HOW SEAN REFUSES TO ACCEPT THE FACT THAT HE GOT CAUGHT OUT TRYING TO SPREAD A HATE CAMPAIGN IN BOREHAMWOOD?

    SEAN YOU BULLSHITTER, THE PICTURES PROVE YOUR GUILT!!!

    WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU BABBLING ON WHEN WE HAVE ALL SEEN YOU AS A NAZI & SATANIST!!!!


    WHY WAS YOU DRESSED LIKE A CAMP VERSION OF HITLER AND AS A DEVIL WORSHIPPER???

    EXPLAIN IT OR SHUT UP YOU LIAR.

    (Reply to this)(Thread)

    Re: SEAN IS SHITTING HIMSELF - (Anonymous), 2006-06-01 06:19 pm UTC
    Re: Ignorance Truly is Bliss for the Farrant Unfortunates - (Anonymous), 2006-06-02 08:10 am UTC
    SEAN THE RETARD
    (Anonymous)
    2006-06-01 06:29 pm UTC (from 82.18.10.226) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    "David Farrant has a history of association with people who hold Neo-Nazi views. He connects, for example, to names such as Philippe Welte and Jean-Paul Bourre, two Frenchman who greatly admired Adolf Hitler when Farrant was in collaboration with them in the 1980s."

    BUT SEAN YOU MORON, YOU'RE THE ONE DRESSED AS A NAZI AND SATANIST!!!
    YOU'RE THE ONE WHO WAS INVOLVED IN THE NAZI SCAM WITH JOHN POPE!!!

    JOHN ADMITS IT IN THE NEWSPAPER ARTICLE!!!

    YOU'RE THE ONE FEATURED IN BROULLE'S BOOK, NOT DAVID!

    YOU TOTALLY THICK MORON.




    "Not the obvious choice for a man whom Farrant and his cronies would have you believe is a "Nazi." "


    BUT SEAN YOU IDIOT....YOU'RE DRESSED AS A NAZI!!!

    WTF!!!
    ARE YOU MENTAL???

    WHY WAS YOU DRESSED AS A NAZI?
    WHY DID YOU TRY TO SELL A FAKE STORY TO THE PAPERS?
    WAS YOU THAT DESPERATE FOR MONEY?

    YOU HAVE BEEN CAUGHT OUT AS A LIAR AND A BULLSHITTER.


    YOU FOOL!
    YOU ARE TOTALLY OWNING YOURSELF YOU THICK, SENILE, PENSIONER.

    (Reply to this)(Thread)

    Re: SEAN THE RETARD - (Anonymous), 2006-06-02 12:07 am UTC
    Re: FARRANT THE LIAR - (Anonymous), 2006-06-02 07:51 am UTC
    Re: FARRANT THE LIAR - (Anonymous), 2006-06-02 07:56 am UTC
    Re: YOU ARE MISREPRESENTING WHAT IS IN THE PICTURES - (Anonymous), 2006-06-02 08:21 am UTC
    Re: SEAN THE RETARD - (Anonymous), 2006-06-02 08:46 am UTC
    Re: FARRANT THE LIAR - (Anonymous), 2006-06-03 07:24 am UTC
    Re:manchester the mullock - (Anonymous), 2006-06-03 05:44 pm UTC
    SEAN ADMITS GUILT
    (Anonymous)
    2006-06-02 05:49 am UTC (from 82.18.10.226) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    Check out this post that Sean Manchester has made.

    http://alexlucard.livejournal.com/846149.html?thread=15376965#t15376965


    Let me draw your attention to the following.
    Sean said:


    "John Pope continued with his Neo-Nazi involvements and more recently published a piece in the journal of the south-western branch of the National Front."


    Sean, you complete half wit.
    Seeing as John Pope is such a non-entity, there are only two ways you could possibly know about this.


    1) YOU ARE IN TOUCH WITH JOHN POPE
    2) YOU ARE SUBSCRIBING TO NF AND ANTI-SEMETIC LITERATURE


    THERE IS NO OTHER WAY YOU COULD KNOW THAT POPE IS WRITING FOR THE NF.

    WHY ARE YOU STILL ABSORBED IN JOHN POPE'S LIFE?
    WHAT OTHER REASON WOULD YOU HAVE TO BE READING SUCH HATE FILLED CRAP?



    WELL DONE FOR HAVING SHOT YOURSELF IN THE FOOT AND ONCE AGAIN, DRIVING ANOTHER NAIL INTO YOUR OWN COFFIN.
    YOU MAKE THIS TOO EASY SEAN.
    YOU STILL HAVEN'T EXPLAINED WHY YOU WAS DRESSED AS A NAZI OR SATANIST AND NOW YOU ADMIT TO READING FASCIST PROPAGANDA.




    I'D CALL THIS AN OWN GOAL SEAN AND YOU REALLY AREN'T DOING YOURSELF ANY FAVOURS.



    Archbishop Shórñ Scrotūm

    (Reply to this)(Thread)

    Re: YOU IDIOT - (Anonymous), 2006-06-04 08:43 am UTC
    Re: YOU IDIOT - (Anonymous), 2006-06-05 03:38 pm UTC
    Photographic Images Are Being Purposely Misrepresented. And This Is Why ...
    (Anonymous)
    2006-06-02 08:26 am UTC (from 195.92.67.75) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    Everything being levelled against Seán Manchester is on the say-so of a convicted felon with a grudge going back decades; someone who is a pathetic little man convicted of indecency in a Barnet churchyard, threatening people with black magic, desecrating and vandalising Highgate Cemetery. Someone, moreover, considered found be a compulsive liar by magistrates, judges and juries. All the malice, misrepresentation and mayhem stems from this one person. Only a misguided fool or someone with an equally depraved agenda would take any notice of him.

    “I have spent most of my life studying accounts of vampirism, and have indeed visited Highgate Cemetery on numerous occasions. How it has changed over the years! I am interested in research into any accounts of actual vampirism, from the writings of Dom Augustine Calmet through to modern day accounts. I have a copy of The Highgate Vampire [by Seán Manchester] which I found very interesting. I remember the events at the time they happened and the various newspaper reports. It was then that I first came across the name ‘David Farrant.’ I met him once in a pub near Highgate and found him to be a compulsive liar and there was something shifty about his mannerism. I have since warned many people to stay clear of him.” ~ Andy Pryce, Birmingham (UK), 19 February 2001

    (Reply to this)

    And all on the say-so of a convicted felon - how very convincing!
    (Anonymous)
    2006-06-02 12:40 pm UTC (from 195.92.67.77) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    Everything being levelled against Bishop Seán Manchester is on the say-so of a convicted felon with a grudge going back decades; someone who is a pathetic little man convicted of indecency in a Barnet churchyard, threatening people with black magic, desecrating and vandalising Highgate Cemetery. Someone, moreover, found to be a compulsive liar by magistrates, judges and juries. All the malice, misrepresentation and mayhem stems from this one person. Only a misguided fool or someone with an equally depraved agenda would take any notice of him.

    The pictures (illegally published here by a Farrant dupe) are being totally misrepresented. One is not the bishop at all. The other is a reconstruction that was infringed by Jean-Paul Bourre and used without the consent of the legal copyright owner in his French book. Bourre, for those who don't realise, was a close associate of Farrant's at the time. Thorne, who stole the other picture, collaborated with Farrant at the time. Both pictures were originally used to misrepresent what they are and they are still being used that way by Farrant. Their reproduction is an infringement of copyright and this is currently being pursued with the relevant authoritiy as all the culprits, accessories included, reside in the United Kingdom.

    “I have spent most of my life studying accounts of vampirism, and have indeed visited Highgate Cemetery on numerous occasions. How it has changed over the years! I am interested in research into any accounts of actual vampirism, from the writings of Dom Augustine Calmet through to modern day accounts. I have a copy of The Highgate Vampire [by Seán Manchester] which I found very interesting. I remember the events at the time they happened and the various newspaper reports. It was then that I first came across the name ‘David Farrant.’ I met him once in a pub near Highgate and found him to be a compulsive liar and there was something shifty about his mannerism. I have since warned many people to stay clear of him.” ~ Andy Pryce, Birmingham (UK), 19 February 2001

    (Reply to this)(Thread)

    Re: And all on the say-so of a convicted felon - how very convincing! - (Anonymous), 2006-06-02 01:21 pm UTC
    Re: And all on the say-so of a convicted felon - how very convincing! - (Anonymous), 2006-06-02 04:17 pm UTC
    Re: And all on the say-so of a convicted felon - how very convincing! - (Anonymous), 2006-06-02 04:22 pm UTC
    Re: Mr. Manchester and The Stolen Human Bones - (Anonymous), 2006-06-02 05:52 pm UTC
    Re: Mr. Manchester and The Stolen Human Bones - (Anonymous), 2006-06-02 06:21 pm UTC
    The Newspaper Article In Full - The Facts
    (Anonymous)
    2006-06-02 06:55 pm UTC (from 82.18.10.226) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
    Ok, so Sean is shitting himself and talking bollocks as usual.
    Well look kiddies, cos I'm such a nice guy and I don't just want you to take my word for it, I've uploaded the entire 3 page article.

    Now remember the rules.
    Step 1 - Right Click & Save
    Step 2 - Go Forth & Multiply the Humility Factor For Sean
    Step 3 - Off A Short Pier Sean. Get that zimmerframe cracking.



    *Page 1*

    [Error: Irreparable invalid markup ('<img src"http://www.picturetrunk.com/uploads/cec482305d.jpg">') in entry. Owner must fix manually. Raw contents below.]

    Ok, so Sean is shitting himself and talking bollocks as usual.
    Well look kiddies, cos I'm such a nice guy and I don't just want you to take my word for it, I've uploaded the entire 3 page article.

    Now remember the rules.
    Step 1 - Right Click & Save
    Step 2 - Go Forth & Multiply the Humility Factor For Sean
    Step 3 - Off A Short Pier Sean. Get that zimmerframe cracking.



    *Page 1*

    <img src"http://www.picturetrunk.com/uploads/cec482305d.jpg">

    <a href="http://www.picturetrunk.com" target="_blank"><img alt="Image Hosted by PictureTrunk" src="http://www.picturetrunk.com/uploads/cec482305d.jpg" /></a>


    *Page 2*

    <img src=http://www.picturetrunk.com/uploads/02b1ac2112.jpg">

    <a href="http://www.picturetrunk.com" target="_blank"><img alt="Image Hosted by PictureTrunk" src="http://www.picturetrunk.com/uploads/02b1ac2112.jpg" /></a>


    *Page 3*

    <img src="http://www.picturetrunk.com/uploads/d0f4e66748.jpg">

    <a href="http://www.picturetrunk.com" target="_blank"><img alt="Image Hosted by PictureTrunk" src="http://www.picturetrunk.com/uploads/d0f4e66748.jpg" /></a>


    <h1><b>THE BEST IS YET TO COME, STRAIGHT FROM THE HORSE'S MOUTH...so to speak.</b></h1>

    (Reply to this)(Thread)

    Re: The Newspaper Article In Full - The Facts - (Anonymous), 2006-06-02 07:04 pm UTC
    Re: The Newspaper Article In Full - The Facts - [info]alexlucard, 2006-06-02 07:31 pm UTC
    Re: The Newspaper Article In Full - The Facts - (Anonymous), 2006-06-02 08:10 pm UTC
    Re: The Newspaper Article In Full - The Facts - [info]alexlucard, 2006-06-02 08:13 pm UTC
    Re: The Newspaper Article In Full - The Facts - (Anonymous), 2006-06-02 08:38 pm UTC
    GET THEE BEHIND ME SATAN" - (Anonymous), 2006-06-03 03:20 pm UTC
    Re: GET THEE BEHIND ME FARRANT" - (Anonymous), 2006-06-04 08:47 am UTC
    Re: GET THEE BEHIND ME SATAN" - (Anonymous), 2006-06-05 12:49 pm UTC

    (Post a new comment)

    Mass action on selected comments:

    Page 1 of 3
    <<[1] [2] [3] >>

    Welcome, [info]alexlucard!