Alexander Lucard ([info]alexlucard) wrote,
@ 2005-05-11 09:48:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Edit Entry  Edit Tags  Next Entry
Vampire Hunter Drama Part 3
http://www.livejournal.com/users/alexlucard/840004.html#cutid1 is part two, and there's a link in there to part one.

Anyway, the arch rival of Sean Manchester, the guy who has been annoying me since I was a teenager and the subject of the last two posts on the subject has emailed me as of last night. This guy has a criminal record a mile long, from digging up corpses and violating them on down.

But at least he's more eloquent in his madness than Machester. here's David Farrant's email to me.




Dear Alex Lucard
I was most intrigued by all your comments here about the so-called Highgate Vampire; not least about myself being a 'vampire hunter'! It would appear that you arrive at most of your conclusions about the Highgate Case and myself from sensational accounts you have gleaned from the internet the problem is however that almost invariably, most of this inaccurate sensationalism as been posted up by Mr Sean Manchester himself (Please note he is NOT a genuing bishop) and if you check back on these accounts you will see that I have only been forced to correct unfounded public allegations made by Mr Manchester himself - albeit frequently hiding behind his usual aliases.

It is not my intention to argue against all the points you have recently made on the insidepulse website, as I appreciate you, like anybody else are entitled to personal opinions (however wrong or misguided these have proved to be in your particular case).

I will just say one thing however, to set the record straight for you - ... I am NOT a 'vampire hunter', in reality I am just a psychic investigator and I do not even accept the existence of 'blood sucking vampires'. Mr Manchester apparently does (as he has publically stated in his self-published book The Highgate Vampire), but that is really his problem! In passing, I can conclude by saying that my non-acceptance of Mr Manchester's ridiculous public claims he makes about 'vampires', has been the main reason for his campaign of hatred against members of The British Psychic and Occult Society and myself.

Yours Sincerely
David Farrant
President BPOS.

NB: In the event that you might be interested my main website can be found at http://www.dfarrant.co.uk also could I refer you to Occult Forums International Vampire Thread, Off Topic Occult. The link is http://www.occultforums.com from which Mr Manchester has just been publically banned (within the last 3 or 4 days or so.


SHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUP! Sigh. My email to him

Ummm...Dave? That column you read of mine was me printing the whack job hilarious emails Manchester sent me. Re-read the column. Those are his words, not mine with me making fun of him at the end.

It was in reference to the column I wrote back in Jan '05 (http://www.insidepulse.com/article.php?contentid=31102) where I recanted the entire Highgate vampire saga.

I know Manchester very well. And by that I mean, I know him by reputation very well, as he's been the butt of American folklorists and parapsychologists for as long as I can remember. Norrine Dresser, Paul barber, Carol Page. All of us snicker quite profusely at the whole "Highgate Vampire" incident.

I'll tell you what I told Manchester: Stop acting like children. Both of you. This happened 30 years ago. My god, both of you are old enough to be at retirement age soon and you're carrying on like schoolchildren about an event maybe 5% of the world remembers and only a fraction thereof even cares that it occured.

All your sniping between the two of you does makes you both look foolish and foppish. Like attention whores deserpately clinging to some sort of public limelight when one of you just needs to start completely ignoring the other. I don't care if he starts it, or is just really good at getting your goat, because the end result is STILL the two of you bickering of the world wide web. Please stop.

-Lucard


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

Get your facts right, Barbara Green
(Anonymous)
2006-06-09 02:26 pm UTC (from 195.92.67.76) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
As usual, Barbara Green hasn't a clue what she's talking about. She's just regurgitating rubbish which was rubbish from its origin.

Seán Manchester could not have "made her sit outside in the freezing cold" because they were both sat INSIDE a restaurant. Neither Seán Manchester nor Carol Page "paid for anything" because, as Page was quick to remind him, it was all being paid for on EXPENSES courtesy of her publisher. He did not "brag about how he had revolutionized the 'hand held' vampire stake." This was a total FABRICATION from Page who had little else to do when the required sensationalism she so deperately sought failed to manifest. Nor was he "annoyed with her cos she did not recognise hims straight away." Another fabrication because, in fact, she recognised him straight away. He had rather more trouble in recognising her as she plodded to her table wearing a massive animal fur with huge trainers on her feet. What a sight! I just wish Seán Manchester had taken a photograph so we could all have had a laugh at this would-be feminist dressed like a thrift shop reject.

Apart from Barbara Green and the usual clique posting here, absolutely nobody has had a good word to say about Carol Page, her book or anything associated with her. Blood Lust proved to be a complete and utter disaster for her and she made a career change soon afterwards. Blood Lust was her first and last commission from a publisher. Quite right too!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Get your facts right, Barbara Green
(Anonymous)
2006-06-09 04:04 pm UTC (from 82.38.130.19) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
she also said you came in in your skin tight breeks from riding your trusty steed in the middle of London! She thought you were a mincing prat anyway, which I think most people are in agreement over, whatever they think of Carol Page.

(Reply to this)(Parent) (Thread)

Re: Get your facts right, Barbara Green
(Anonymous)
2006-06-10 11:32 am UTC (from 195.92.67.74) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
She said nothing of the sort. Read the book if you can face all that drivel again.

Name those who agree with Carol Page and yourself beyond the small clique already posting here.

....... ?

No, I didn't think you could.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Get your facts right, Barbara Green
(Anonymous)
2006-06-09 08:41 pm UTC (from 172.201.149.120) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
Look in the Mirror!

Well, of course, you would say that wouldn’t you, Mr. Manchester, because after meeting you, Carol Page could not find one good thing to say about you in her book. She did report her first hand observations of yourself, however, and one was that she did not agree with your initial suggestion that you looked in the least bit like the genuine Lord Byron.

I think it is her personal observations that must take primary importance, rather than your apparent delusions of how you would otherwise like to see yourself.

DAVID FARRANT.


(Reply to this)(Parent) (Thread)

Re: Get your facts right, Barbara Green
(Anonymous)
2006-06-10 10:58 am UTC (from 81.77.225.157) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
Actually I can confirm that Rosemary Ellen Guiley IS not against David Farrant. But I am not allowed to say anything further then that. So again Mr. Manchester where is your evidence that Rosemary is against David. Again we have to take your word for it that she IS. Well I've got Evidence that she isn't not that it is going to go on here mind you.

Catherine Fearnley

(Reply to this)(Parent) (Thread)

Re: Get your facts right, Barbara Green
[info]alexlucard
2006-06-10 02:55 pm UTC (from 65.27.110.141) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
Actually I can confirm that too.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Get your facts right, Catherine Fearnley
(Anonymous)
2006-06-10 04:20 pm UTC (from 195.92.67.74) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
And I can confirm that Rosemary Ellen Guiley is not against Seán Manchester.

For heaven's sake, Rosemary Guiley personally attended his ordination into the priesthood!

Her book Vampires Among Us says a number of kind and supportive things about Seán Manchester. It says nothing against him.

Seán Manchester has correspondence from her which clearly states how she feels about Farrant.

(Reply to this)(Parent) (Thread)

Re: Get your facts right, Catherine Fearnley
(Anonymous)
2006-06-10 05:44 pm UTC (from 82.38.130.19) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen

2006-06-10 04:20 pm UTC (link)
And I can confirm that Rosemary Ellen Guiley is not against Seán Manchester. "Sean Manchester"

I never said that she wasn't Mr. Manchester. What I had said was that she wasn't against David Farrant, again you are making it up as you go along. Grow up for heaven's sake!!!!

Ordination into Priesthood since when! For one minute I do not believe that you are a Priest, Bishop or anything else for that matter. Proper Priests and Bishops neither have the time nor the inclination to spend hours upon hours posting drivel about nothing on the internet.

Catherine Fearnley


(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Get your facts right, Farrant
(Anonymous)
2006-06-10 11:23 am UTC (from 195.92.67.74) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
You were there were you, Farrant?

The subject of Byron did not arise and was not mentioned by either party, as Seán Manchester confirmed at the time.

If you want to pretend that anyone and everyone in the world who supports Seán Manchester is Seán Manchester, be my guest.

It still doesn't explain how he has well over a thousand members on his forums while you have how many, a dozen or so?

Are all these people really Seán Manchester in disguise?

I don't think so.

(Reply to this)(Parent) (Thread)

Re: Get your facts right, Farrant
[info]alexlucard
2006-06-10 02:57 pm UTC (from 65.27.110.141) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
It's the anonimity of it all. I have to admit then when Machester's detractors use their real names it gives them more credence, and when "all" of manchesters don't and he's known for a penchance for speaking in the third person, it does strongly tilt things towards the belief it's all one person trying to defend him.

(Reply to this)(Parent) (Thread)

Re: Get your facts right, Lucard
(Anonymous)
2006-06-10 04:13 pm UTC (from 195.92.67.74) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
"and he's known for a penchance for speaking in the third person"

Known by whom?

All you are talking about are Farrant and company plus transient dupes.

(Reply to this)(Parent) (Thread)

Re: Get your facts right, Lucard
[info]alexlucard
2006-06-10 05:27 pm UTC (from 65.27.110.141) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
Several web pages from Portal of Evil on down.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Publicity-seekers obviously publish their names
(Anonymous)
2006-06-10 04:17 pm UTC (from 195.92.67.74) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
How do you know "Manchester's detractors" are using their real names?

Even so, the trio who probably are using their real names do so because they crave publicity above all else.

What would be the point if they didn't advertise who they are?

Those supporting Seán Manchester obviously feel no need to self-advertise and probably don't want to attract the harassment and hate that he has been subject to on blogs such as this one.

(Reply to this)(Parent) (Thread)

Re: Publicity-seekers obviously publish their names
[info]alexlucard
2006-06-10 05:28 pm UTC (from 65.27.110.141) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
You do realize that comment pretty much says "there is only me."

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Publicity-seekers obviously publish their names
(Anonymous)
2006-06-10 05:47 pm UTC (from 82.38.130.19) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
Those supporting Mr. Manchester???? Ha don't make me laugh, Mr.Manchester has not got any supporters maybe with the exception of his wife and 'Brother Keith'. And the reason why You don't put names is because this way you can say what you want to say and when anyone tries to trace it back, it comes up as 'anonymous' when we really know that it is yourself all along, Mr. Manchester, you are a coward and gutless, that is another reason.

Catherine Fearnley

(Reply to this)(Parent) (Thread)

Re: Publicity-seekers obviously publish their names
(Anonymous)
2006-06-11 09:20 am UTC (from 195.92.67.76) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
I suppose that explains why well over a thousand people have subscribed to his forums with supportive testimonies and statements upon joining.

Meanwhile, you and Farrant attract how many people onto your forums?

(Reply to this)(Parent) (Thread)

Re: Publicity-seekers obviously publish their names
(Anonymous)
2006-06-14 01:45 pm UTC (from 84.68.198.20) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
We've got more than you think Mr. Manchester but why should we indulge you on here. We are not about to break the Data-Protection act for your benefit.

Catherine Fearnley

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

Mass action on selected comments:

Welcome, [info]alexlucard!