Alexander Lucard ([info]alexlucard) wrote,
@ 2005-05-11 09:48:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Edit Entry  Edit Tags  Next Entry
Vampire Hunter Drama Part 3
http://www.livejournal.com/users/alexlucard/840004.html#cutid1 is part two, and there's a link in there to part one.

Anyway, the arch rival of Sean Manchester, the guy who has been annoying me since I was a teenager and the subject of the last two posts on the subject has emailed me as of last night. This guy has a criminal record a mile long, from digging up corpses and violating them on down.

But at least he's more eloquent in his madness than Machester. here's David Farrant's email to me.




Dear Alex Lucard
I was most intrigued by all your comments here about the so-called Highgate Vampire; not least about myself being a 'vampire hunter'! It would appear that you arrive at most of your conclusions about the Highgate Case and myself from sensational accounts you have gleaned from the internet the problem is however that almost invariably, most of this inaccurate sensationalism as been posted up by Mr Sean Manchester himself (Please note he is NOT a genuing bishop) and if you check back on these accounts you will see that I have only been forced to correct unfounded public allegations made by Mr Manchester himself - albeit frequently hiding behind his usual aliases.

It is not my intention to argue against all the points you have recently made on the insidepulse website, as I appreciate you, like anybody else are entitled to personal opinions (however wrong or misguided these have proved to be in your particular case).

I will just say one thing however, to set the record straight for you - ... I am NOT a 'vampire hunter', in reality I am just a psychic investigator and I do not even accept the existence of 'blood sucking vampires'. Mr Manchester apparently does (as he has publically stated in his self-published book The Highgate Vampire), but that is really his problem! In passing, I can conclude by saying that my non-acceptance of Mr Manchester's ridiculous public claims he makes about 'vampires', has been the main reason for his campaign of hatred against members of The British Psychic and Occult Society and myself.

Yours Sincerely
David Farrant
President BPOS.

NB: In the event that you might be interested my main website can be found at http://www.dfarrant.co.uk also could I refer you to Occult Forums International Vampire Thread, Off Topic Occult. The link is http://www.occultforums.com from which Mr Manchester has just been publically banned (within the last 3 or 4 days or so.


SHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUP! Sigh. My email to him

Ummm...Dave? That column you read of mine was me printing the whack job hilarious emails Manchester sent me. Re-read the column. Those are his words, not mine with me making fun of him at the end.

It was in reference to the column I wrote back in Jan '05 (http://www.insidepulse.com/article.php?contentid=31102) where I recanted the entire Highgate vampire saga.

I know Manchester very well. And by that I mean, I know him by reputation very well, as he's been the butt of American folklorists and parapsychologists for as long as I can remember. Norrine Dresser, Paul barber, Carol Page. All of us snicker quite profusely at the whole "Highgate Vampire" incident.

I'll tell you what I told Manchester: Stop acting like children. Both of you. This happened 30 years ago. My god, both of you are old enough to be at retirement age soon and you're carrying on like schoolchildren about an event maybe 5% of the world remembers and only a fraction thereof even cares that it occured.

All your sniping between the two of you does makes you both look foolish and foppish. Like attention whores deserpately clinging to some sort of public limelight when one of you just needs to start completely ignoring the other. I don't care if he starts it, or is just really good at getting your goat, because the end result is STILL the two of you bickering of the world wide web. Please stop.

-Lucard


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

The only way to resolve this matter is by a lie detector test ...
(Anonymous)
2006-06-06 03:42 pm UTC (from 195.92.67.69) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
I have been asked not to comment further here, so I shall conclude by reminding interested parties that Seán Manchester has offered to take a lie detector test on the matter of the alleged black magic telephone calls for the past thirty-six years and has reiterated that offer via his people for the past five years on the internet. That offer, I happen to know, stands and will remain standing irrespective as to whether Farrant consents to a lie detector test or not.

If (and that's an extremely big "IF") Farrant does consent, he should agree to answer the following:

Did you bear a grudge against Mr Bradish because of his alleged advances to your first wife prior to your separation in 1969?

Did you run a campaign against Mr Bradish at the time whereby you left malicious stickers against the man in pub toilets and other places?

Do you accept that Mrs Bradish was suffering from serious mental problems during the relevant period?

Did you make the black magic telephone calls alluded to by Mrs Bradish in court in 1970?

Seán Manchester will unilaterally take a lie detector test on this matter.

It only remains for someone sufficiently interested in the United Kingdom to make the necessary arrangements.

Farrant knows how to contact Seán Manchester via the internet should an approach be made to him by a professional body who would be willing to carry out such a test.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

LIE DETECTOR TEST...
(Anonymous)
2006-06-06 05:14 pm UTC (from 172.212.106.164) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
“AND THERE CAME A GIANT SPIDER” . . .

So, I see that you have now asked yourself not to post again here, Mr. Manchester.

As has already been made abundantly clear to you elsewhere on the Web, Mr. Manchester, it was myself who first offered to take a lie detector test back in 1976 over my convictions at Highgate Cemetery. The Home Office replied that I was free to take a lie detector test (over whether or not I had really committed that two charges of desecration at HC) , but that any results could not be considered in my request for a re-trial.

I therefore abandoned the idea, but when you visited myself in 1977, I showed you a copy of the Home Office letter. So your idea now (like most of your other ‘publicity ideas’), is not really in the least original.

I recently agreed to take a lie detector test on the most important issues.

I offered to answer three basic questions . . . 1) Had I in fact committed the two offences at Highgate Cemetery? 2) Have I ever sacrificed a cat? (or any other animal) and 3) Have I ever been involved in Satanism or black magic?

You have consistently made these allegations against myself, Mr. Manchester, but you have so far ignored my offer to answer these important questions. The reason certainly speaks for itself.

In return, I asked that you answer three basic questions . . . 1) Is it true that you staked a vampire through its heart in its coffin that gave out a ‘mighty roar’ and then turned to slime and viscera in the bottom of the casket? 2) Is it true that in 1982, you again ‘staked’ one of this vampire’s disciples you called ‘Lusia’ after it/she had changed into a ‘giant spider? And 3) Is it true that you are really related by blood to the poet :Lord Byron?

If you would be prepared to answer these important questions, then I would, of course, be prepared to answer your somewhat trivial questions about John Bradish.

Please let me know here. If you don’t, people are entitled to draw their own conclusions.

I am waiting . . .

DAVID FARRANT

(Reply to this)(Parent) (Thread)

Re: LIE DETECTOR TEST...
(Anonymous)
2006-06-07 07:48 am UTC (from 195.92.67.65) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
people will draw their own conclusions by farrent referring to the bradish dispute as 'somewhat trivial'

(Reply to this)(Parent) (Thread)

Re: LIE DETECTOR TEST...
(Anonymous)
2006-06-07 03:37 pm UTC (from 84.66.33.50) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
So much for 'anonymous' alias Mr. Sean Manchester not contributing anymore. He simply just cannot resist can he? And yes we know it's you because your ISP has shown up on more than one occasion on our message board today, but we know it is you anyway.

Catherine Fearnley

(Reply to this)(Parent) (Thread)

Re: LIE DETECTOR TEST...
(Anonymous)
2006-06-11 08:43 am UTC (from 195.92.67.76) (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
Get a life, Fearnley.

Sean Manchester is probably unaware this blog even exists.

Your life revolves around waging a hate campaign against this man.

Every day of your life you post abuse about just one person, not just on your own blogs and boards but on other people's.

When do you ever work? Do you work? Somehow I doubt it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

Mass action on selected comments:

Welcome, [info]alexlucard!