Alexander Lucard ([info]alexlucard) wrote,
@ 2005-05-11 09:48:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Edit Entry  Edit Tags  Next Entry
Vampire Hunter Drama Part 3 is part two, and there's a link in there to part one.

Anyway, the arch rival of Sean Manchester, the guy who has been annoying me since I was a teenager and the subject of the last two posts on the subject has emailed me as of last night. This guy has a criminal record a mile long, from digging up corpses and violating them on down.

But at least he's more eloquent in his madness than Machester. here's David Farrant's email to me.

Dear Alex Lucard
I was most intrigued by all your comments here about the so-called Highgate Vampire; not least about myself being a 'vampire hunter'! It would appear that you arrive at most of your conclusions about the Highgate Case and myself from sensational accounts you have gleaned from the internet the problem is however that almost invariably, most of this inaccurate sensationalism as been posted up by Mr Sean Manchester himself (Please note he is NOT a genuing bishop) and if you check back on these accounts you will see that I have only been forced to correct unfounded public allegations made by Mr Manchester himself - albeit frequently hiding behind his usual aliases.

It is not my intention to argue against all the points you have recently made on the insidepulse website, as I appreciate you, like anybody else are entitled to personal opinions (however wrong or misguided these have proved to be in your particular case).

I will just say one thing however, to set the record straight for you - ... I am NOT a 'vampire hunter', in reality I am just a psychic investigator and I do not even accept the existence of 'blood sucking vampires'. Mr Manchester apparently does (as he has publically stated in his self-published book The Highgate Vampire), but that is really his problem! In passing, I can conclude by saying that my non-acceptance of Mr Manchester's ridiculous public claims he makes about 'vampires', has been the main reason for his campaign of hatred against members of The British Psychic and Occult Society and myself.

Yours Sincerely
David Farrant
President BPOS.

NB: In the event that you might be interested my main website can be found at also could I refer you to Occult Forums International Vampire Thread, Off Topic Occult. The link is from which Mr Manchester has just been publically banned (within the last 3 or 4 days or so.

SHUTUPSHUTUPSHUTUP! Sigh. My email to him

Ummm...Dave? That column you read of mine was me printing the whack job hilarious emails Manchester sent me. Re-read the column. Those are his words, not mine with me making fun of him at the end.

It was in reference to the column I wrote back in Jan '05 ( where I recanted the entire Highgate vampire saga.

I know Manchester very well. And by that I mean, I know him by reputation very well, as he's been the butt of American folklorists and parapsychologists for as long as I can remember. Norrine Dresser, Paul barber, Carol Page. All of us snicker quite profusely at the whole "Highgate Vampire" incident.

I'll tell you what I told Manchester: Stop acting like children. Both of you. This happened 30 years ago. My god, both of you are old enough to be at retirement age soon and you're carrying on like schoolchildren about an event maybe 5% of the world remembers and only a fraction thereof even cares that it occured.

All your sniping between the two of you does makes you both look foolish and foppish. Like attention whores deserpately clinging to some sort of public limelight when one of you just needs to start completely ignoring the other. I don't care if he starts it, or is just really good at getting your goat, because the end result is STILL the two of you bickering of the world wide web. Please stop.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

Gareth Medway's / David Farrant's Fabrications Should Be Put To The Test
2006-06-03 04:42 pm UTC (from (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
Gareth Meday / David Farrant alleges that Bishop Manchester was "expelled from the National Front" etc.

Where is the evidence for that statement?

Where is the evidence that Bishop Manchester has ever been a member of any political party, much less the National Front?

This is fabricated nonsense originating with David Farrant.

Let's put it to the test. Let's see some evidence that Bishop Manchester ever held membership in any political party at any time in his entire life. So far all we have is Farrant's word and that is surely not good enough. He has been found to be a compulsive liar by judges and juries in the past. If the bishop ever help NF (or any other) membership there will be a record of it somewhere. Someone would know about it. There is no record and nobody does know about it because it is all lies.

It was not Bishop Manchester who threatened to stand as a WWP candidate at the 1978 General Election on a platform that might well have been that belonging to the National Socialist Party. It was Farrant.

It was not Bishop Manchester who claimed in the press that he had amalgamated with other political parties, eg the National Front. It was Farrant.

It was not Bishop Manchester who used Neo-Nazi runes as logos on his circulars. It was Farrant.

It was not Bishop Manchester who cultivated Neo-Nazi acquaintances as friends and supporters. It was Farrant.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Here's Your Proof Sean
2006-06-03 06:17 pm UTC (from (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
Here you go baldy.
Choke on it.

Now explain why you are dressed like a Nazi and make it good.
Or you could avoid it and make yourself look even more guilty.


(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Gareth Medway's / David Farrant's Fabrications Should Be Put To The Test
2006-06-03 07:11 pm UTC (from (link) DeleteFreezeScreen

In Court in 1970, Mrs. Gillian Bradish said that she recognised your voice on the telephone when you made your vile threats as she had fequently heard you yalking in company in a pub.

You said (in Court) that you couldn’t have phoned her as her telephone number was ex-directory! (This is a main point which led to you being held responsible for the phone calls0.

If you hadn’t previously tried to telephone her, then how would you even know that her number was ex-directory?

And another thing. You said you were later paid compensation by the Court for this. This is an outright lie. YOU WERE NOT.

Where is your hard evidence to back up this statement? Please either refer us to it, or produce it here.


(Reply to this)(Parent) (Thread)

Re: Gareth Medway's / David Farrant's Fabrications Should Be Put To The Test
2006-06-04 09:00 am UTC (from (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
A copy of the compensation documentation can be made available.

Gillian Bradish suffered from serious mental illness before, during and after the 1970 court case where she made the black magic allegations. She had been under psychiatric observation for some due to her paranoid schizophrenic and depressed state. Farrant obviously knew this and preyed upon this fact when he sought to have his revenge against her husband (who he believed had made advances towards his wife before their separation) and Bishop Manchester (who had dismissed Farrant's media claims regarding his pursuit of the Highgate Vampire as bogus and transparent attention-seeking). Sadly, Mrs Bradish eventually committed suicide, but not before realising soon after the court case that Farrant was the real culprit. Her husband was likewise in absolutely no doubt that Farrant was responsible for the malicious telephone calls, having also reached that realisation soon afterwards. It did not take a genius to work it out even without Farrant boasting to his drinking partners immediately following the case that he had set Bishop Manchester up by making the calls himself. The bishop did not know the couple, did not know their address and could not have known their telephone number which was revealed to be ex-directory. Farrant did, of course, and, moreover, had just become their lodger, albeit not for long.

Should a professionally executed lie detector test become available, Bishop Manchester would agree to taking it unilaterally on this single issue because he feels it is at the root of the feud. Farrant will not take the test even if he claimed otherwise beforehand. In that most unlikely event, however, the bishop would insist on the following question being directed to Farrant and also to himself: "Did you you make the black magic telephone threats to Mrs Gillian Bradish?"

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Gareth Medway's / David Farrant's Fabrications Should Be Put To The Test
2006-06-05 03:07 pm UTC (from (link) DeleteFreezeScreen

From the point of view of a neutral who has just surfed on, you all sound like a bunch of nutters. Care in the community clearly isn't working!

What HAS happened to this site?

(Reply to this)(Parent) (Thread)

Re: Gareth Medway's / David Farrant's Fabrications Should Be Put To The Test
2006-06-05 03:31 pm UTC (from (link) DeleteFreezeScreen
They are all nutters. Thankfully the only clog up this one teeny section of the site.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

Mass action on selected comments:

Welcome, [info]alexlucard!